Quote from: MinersAnonymous on August 11, 2014, 11:31:59 PM

Quote from: Billbags on August 11, 2014, 11:13:15 PM

Quote from: MinersAnonymous on August 11, 2014, 10:10:26 PM

Quote from: twib2 on August 11, 2014, 09:59:52 PM

Quote from: MinersAnonymous on August 11, 2014, 09:12:24 PM

Do any of you here know why the queue on the config is set so high? Is there a big gain from setting it to a lower number or why did they program 4096 as the queue. The discarded amounts are so high...

If you want, you can change the queue in /etc/init.d/cgminer

I use 32 and it seems to be a good compromise. Some people use 1, others have kept 4096 - doesn't seem to have a huge effect, but can save you some CPU cycles if you make it lower.

Okay thanks, I will search. Does the 4096 and large amount of discarded not affect the overall hashrate and work submitted? Also, is 32 equivalent to 32shares or a share in that size? I ask because I did not know if 4096 was 4096 shares or a share/shares added for a vardiff of 4096

Look at cklolivas(cgminer dev) post in this thread. Goes into great detail about this.

I will try. The results from search is a bit overwhelming in such a large thread. I was hoping for a single quick fix answer but I will try to read through the results
[/quote

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg8056057#msg8056057