Quote from: Helium7878 on August 11, 2014, 11:20:43 PM

Quote from: dogie on August 11, 2014, 12:04:07 AM

Quote from: Helium7878 on August 10, 2014, 02:55:52 PM

Thanks for this list. I'd argue with Bitmine: "Refund Issues? Some 5/10"

Bitmine has only made some token refunds to give people false hope. The majority appear to not have received refunds:

http://www.bitminerefund.com

I know people after me in the queue have been refunded. They are picking select users to refund as a stall tactic. They've told many users on this forum they will be refunded "in 2 weeks", and we haven't been. I've been told that 2 or three times now. My refund was due May 5th. Many clients fall into the same category as this.

This falls into the category of:
"1/10 = Yes - refunds significantly delayed or not being processed at all. Includes stall tactics."

Some refunds have been paid, so that's the category they fit in to. I have no control over this, that's how the system works and it applies to everyone.

Don't look at refund sites like this. People rush to get submitted but will rarely go back to the site to say they've been refunded. They have refund issues, they've also refunded some people.

That's fair enough. If you have a 10 point scale, why not take advantage of it? They've paid some refunds, but they've used stall tactics again and again. Many of us have been told repeatedly we'll be paid in 2 weeks. Wouldn't a rating of 2 or 3 be more accurate?

A system like this requires as few options as possible to remove the human from the system and let the system do the ranking. The system is already considered as too 'opinionised' as it is (even though there is are opinions at all), adding more options would only feed the trolls.