Re: [ANN]Joincoin (J) ToR Anonymous All Algorithm mining! On C-CEX now trading.
"version" : 1010101,
"protocolversion" : 1001,
"walletversion" : 300,
"balance" : 2.50000000,
"blocks" : 391,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"pow_algo_id" : 2,
"pow_algo" : "x13",
"difficulty" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_sha" : 2385.81132495,
"difficulty_x11" : 4.01287318,
"difficulty_x13" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_x15" : 0.02978161,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 0.01562477,
"difficulty_nist5" : 0.20509619,
"difficulty_groestle" : 8.95962472,
"difficulty_pentablake" : 0.38569512,
"difficulty_whirlpool" : 0.84984568,
"difficulty_luffa" : 0.79904166,
"difficulty_keccak" : 0.34481761,
"difficulty_quark" : 0.02626831,
"difficulty_bastion" : 0.49461871,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1407970251,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
@Dev: To give you a clue.. Check Diff and nBits ... (for the X algos)
"protocolversion" : 1001,
"walletversion" : 300,
"balance" : 2.50000000,
"blocks" : 391,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"pow_algo_id" : 2,
"pow_algo" : "x13",
"difficulty" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_sha" : 2385.81132495,
"difficulty_x11" : 4.01287318,
"difficulty_x13" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_x15" : 0.02978161,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 0.01562477,
"difficulty_nist5" : 0.20509619,
"difficulty_groestle" : 8.95962472,
"difficulty_pentablake" : 0.38569512,
"difficulty_whirlpool" : 0.84984568,
"difficulty_luffa" : 0.79904166,
"difficulty_keccak" : 0.34481761,
"difficulty_quark" : 0.02626831,
"difficulty_bastion" : 0.49461871,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1407970251,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
@Dev: To give you a clue.. Check Diff and nBits ... (for the X algos)
Working quickly to fix this issue with the x algos before normal block rewards come in to play. Will have updated wallet and github asap.
Good... Next time contact a pool admin for the code review and TEST it before (every algo, not just SHA)
We tested it and they all worked but this was at diffs we could produce, sha was not the only algo we tested and if you believe that then I am sorry for your misconception.
Fix pushed to Github, compiling windows wallet now.
I can easily get diff > 3 or 4 with a single 280x @ x11/x13/x15 ...
I'll be standing clear from now on.
Sorry guys - you'll be fine.
Maybe an apology in is in order to Ocminer, dude has run top notch pools for months and you crucify him trying for actually trying to tell people to do some due diligence? This coin's team should actually tap into his talent or people like him to find a simple flaw he found in the code in a very short amount of time. You cheerleaders amaze me at times.
I don't think anybody has an issue with him pointing out that people should do their due diligence or pointing out legitimate flaws in the code. The issue was that his original posting was a bit FUDdy and threw around some wild accusations. All of this happened before the current wallet flaw was known.
As for him finding the problem in the code: great job, there's nothing else to say about that part.