Quote from: Nautica on August 15, 2014, 01:58:55 PM

Quote from: niothor on August 15, 2014, 01:52:05 PM

Quote from: Nautica on August 15, 2014, 01:41:15 PM

Quote from: Viper1 on August 15, 2014, 01:37:30 PM

Quote from: maok on August 15, 2014, 01:30:20 PM

you are creating a precedent here. It is totally a centralized decision which will set a precedent in the future when and if crypto will be accepted as global currency. It will create the option for big entity to bring his mining power in action whenever a rolling back will be in his favour. This is an unwritten rule. Crypto stands for irreversibility not for lets take another look and if it doesn't suits us lets rewrite history by using latent forces of mining whenever a rolling back suits us.

crypto will never be accepted as a global currency with these types of things happening on a regular basis. I can understand not wanting to roll back the entire blockchain, but the patch that just rolls back the hackers transactions is a very reasonable solution. There has to be some form of "justice" or anarchy will reign and no one outside the crypto community will take any of this as a serious option.

THANK YOU. Freezing a single transaction on the blockchain is perfectly reasonable and sane. What are we, hardcore buddhists that practice radical acceptance of some guy just running away with 5% of the world supply of NXT when we could have just launched a new wallet and denied those to him? If somebody has 5% of the world NXT to play around with, NXT is dead. If the NXT community lets this opportunity go because of some dogmatic ideological belief, NXT will look like a joke and will truely die. The fact we can do this is ADDED VALUE to the blockchain. If you want your transactions to be truely irreversible, then move to a crypto where that is the case (none of them) and stop bowing down the entirely fallacious altar of of the free market.

Yes , next time it will be a gambling site that will get it's wallet frozen because some accuses of cheating , then maybe a shop , then persons , ...and the Pandora box is open.

Who decides if the transaction should be frozen? A bunch of people.
Just like the government and the fed is doing it.

This is no different than nodes confirming and forging transactions like it happens all the time. The nodes determine which ones are valid and push them onto the network. In this case, the majority determines that that transaction is not valid and makes the blockchain grow based on that.

You're simply too confused to talk about this.

It's precisely the OPPOSITE of how the government and fed are doing it.

We are talking about the majority of the actors in the NXT network (you and me) choosing to forget about a single transaction. This is just about the most decentralised and democratic action that could take place. Have you lost your freaking mind?

Hello, dumbass, are you hearing what you are saying?

"lets get together and not count a REAL transaction". GREAT IDEA? Roll Eyes

IT IS
SUICIDE!!