Quote from: SushiChef on August 16, 2014, 05:46:38 PM

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 05:42:35 PM

For those who are still "confused", let me repeat again:

XC claimed to have implemented multisig. If this is true, then it is trivial to provide some multisig addresses with multisig tx associated with them, that we can see and inspect in the blockchain.

Saying implemented multisig but unable to provide even one multisig address? That dev provided some links deemed to be multisig transactions, but we don't even see one single multisig address there. He keep talking m-of-m (a joke for those who know what is multisig for), and provided regular addresses as multisig addresses, do you think he knows anything about multisig?

Some community members just show what a true XC multisig address look like. Now if you continue claim XC has it, show everyone the address and tx in the blockchain. Nothing is simpler, and let's not waste our (and everyone's) time by arguing. There's nothing to argue here, just show the facts! Experts know what you are talking about.

And like stated before: Why do you want us to provide this information? You can do it all yourself it seems..

Instead of coming to our Community and build some trust to get us explaining you things you make a thread with stupid claims that don't hold any grounds.

Sushi, it's not worth it. XC is a community that tries to be respectful to other coins and not FUD. We are mostly a very mature community. Obviously these folks are not mature and must be quite young. I don't think they are doing any favors for Supercoin. Real money doesn't want join a coin that has this type of people in their forum.