Quote from: BrewCrewFan on August 16, 2014, 06:49:29 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on August 16, 2014, 06:47:23 PM

Quote from: G-Bert on August 16, 2014, 06:10:11 PM

Quote from: some138 on August 16, 2014, 06:05:45 PM

lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument??

I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Grin

Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions.

Can someone with the technical knowledge answer this as soon as possible please.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741018.new#new

They are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's.

The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties.

Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htm

So in other words it is indeed working as intended but the fools can not wrap their heads around understanding it, or just do not want to.

I am thinking. these dumbass do not understand and will bite again.