Quote from: dadon on August 16, 2014, 07:09:31 PM

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 07:04:38 PM

Quote from: braxx on August 16, 2014, 06:58:26 PM

I will post it in BIG letters... no fud so no reason to delete

Quote from: atcsecure on August 16, 2014, 06:47:23 PM

They are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's.

The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties.

Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htm

No need to be big letters, it seems that you are so desperate. My reply was just above your post. Here let me post it again:

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 06:52:46 PM

You made me laugh again, where is the multisig address in this link?

The following are quoted from greenclover:

Quote

Multisig addresses usually start with a different letter than their regular address. For example, Bitcoin's regular address starts with "1", its multisig address starts with "3". Supercoin's regular address starts with "S", its multisig address starts with "C". Mammothcoin's regular address starts with "M", its multisig address starts with "b". etc. For XC, its regular address starts with X and multisig address starts with "4". Everyone can create a multisig address using XC client and verify yourself.

SO!! is it settled XC does use Multisig, your two threads have been proven to be a waste of time and made you look not only stupid but desperate, next time try harder..bye

Where is it the multisig addres you used??? simple question can't answer?

Stop cheating people!