Quote from: demgains on August 16, 2014, 10:08:06 PM

Quote from: SushiChef on August 16, 2014, 10:03:04 PM

They are even deleting normal responses that don't agree with them and provide good arguments..

not only that, but along with posting stuff like this

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742025.msg8386280#msg8386280

How can you leave a post like this up and remove other ones. I had about 10 posts deleted so far, its clear that they are trying to paint a picture that is skewed in their favor and making it seems like we cannot come up with a legitimate response even though we have multiple times. Utterly pathetic, I wish the worst for Supercoin and its future.

This was removed as well:

Quote from: marseille on Today at 08:49:59 PM
BTW, this is Gavin Andersen's example on the multisig in Bitcoin. Supercoin/mammothcoin implemented exactly the multisig technology, same is done at OpenBazaar.

https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/3966071

XC devs please learn and hope you will have a real multisig system implemented, not just a name.

read before he deletes this:

Funny... do you still use AOL for your email as well. You are using bitcoin technology and open bazaar's rationale, both without anon.... therefore nodes can be more trusted, but they have to be trusted. XC offers trustless mixing where every node signs off and can't steal coins, if it doesn't sign, it resyncs and sends the transaction to another set. Highly likely most transactions will be very quick, but if there is an attempt to be a bad actor they are inhibited from gaining access to the coins. Your old technology multi sig allows bad actors/nodes to steal coins. THis has been know for a long time, with coins before yours that you stole to write your code. In fact you deleted a 500 post thread because it primarily discussed the inadequacies of this design.