Quote from: Rnbin on August 18, 2014, 01:06:52 AM

To point something out, the guy who started that fud thread wrote this before (in another thread)

Quote from: mr_random on August 16, 2014, 07:41:55 PM

I would try to defend against those fudsters but I don't have the technical knowledge, like most people here.

A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.

Oh and he's a XC supporter.

Funny how you can influence a market that easy. The issue that claims to be the reason it's 'fundamentally broken' is an issue all devs are aware of and (as stated before) is something impossible for a dev (especially ours) to just have forgotten to think about. It's ridiculous these statements are made without looking at the coding. They stated themselves that "you can't claim to have trustless anon with a whitepaper that has no codes explanation" but somehow they have the ability to tell it's broken ? Come on...

look at XC:

Quote

See the facts below:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742025.0
with the conclusion here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742025.msg8402058#msg8402058

It's a shame for them.

BTW the issues raised against Supercoin are not issues, I found the discussions in this thread (don't read that XC fud thread, it does not make any sense):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=734578.msg8402776#msg8402776