Quote from: scorpio18 on August 20, 2014, 12:17:33 PM

Quote from: crackfoo on August 20, 2014, 12:10:13 PM

Quote from: scorpio18 on August 20, 2014, 08:30:36 AM

Hmm , again the front end on mokux is down and i think a big hash is on it , i see on explorer this address found a lot of blocks 1BQzsBgrDzxMoUXKYSpz81XHeGw4Pi7jn3 , the block explorer show is p2pool but is not , is a nomp pool and mokux is a nomp pool Cheesy

On nice hash there are 2 who rented almost all the hash on SHA256 so Huh

5 workers on mokux and 250th/s+

Again, working over 51%?

I dont know what to say , the front end is down so i can not see what hash has on pool but i think a big one , that address that i post it found a lot of blocks and i see the payouts from that address go to this one that is on rich list 14fjwwZU9oNv8EzA4wGx1dTvNgZQCh1fN8 , you can check the block explorer on blocks found

The best way is the guy who rented that hash power to spread on all pools Wink

Use Internet Explorer. Firefox isn´t working with this pool.

Theses are the 5 workers:

14fjwwZU9oNv8EzA4wGx1dTvNgZQCh1fN8 7159808 0 100% 93.23 TH -> Richlist #3 with 5351 BIG
1KyKZmWpRXiJSQcU7VxyGEnHwbLWJQJpxg 13590528 0 100% 176.96 TH -> Richlist #N/A with 225 BIG
1qRdYAwL1iq7BWoFB7bxvzPecgx6FTV1Z 2919 0 100% 38.92 GH -> Richlist #3 with 5 BIG
1PvuVtjG46eDitR61zGX5nUY5JzbJv5SJw 7778 0 100% 103.72 GH -> Richlist no result
1Gh214x24qPvRsafQBfjTHmZzW9QKj1tdR 233472 0 100% 3.04 TH -> Richlist #N/A with 1 BIG

1KyKZmWpRXiJSQcU7VxyGEnHwbLWJQJpxg (225 BIG) seems to be a new one. Maybe one of the haters? lol