Quote from: TraderThom on August 22, 2014, 08:50:14 AM

Quote from: alani123 on August 22, 2014, 08:28:07 AM

As of writing this the page is up again

I was requested to come here ans ask BT representatives some questions. I think this is a nice chance to finally get an answer on some stuff I've been pointing out for months now.
First of all, I feel like there is not enough effort being put on proving that the company is actually generating profit. I know there are two options to invest the pool and arbitrary trading. BT has no excuse about not showing public proof about either of those and I'll tell you why.

First of all, if you own mining equipment that is pointed toward a pool, you can just show people the address that you collect the coins at or alternatively to show a picture of the rigs (if BT is the owner of them).

Now it's a bit harder that there's indeed profit from trading, but you can at least show your users the trades. I'm sure that you're already aware how big traders prove to their investors that their profit is indeed being generated from trades. Since all of your investors come online to check their investments this would be even easier for BT. Instead of just following the Cristine Madoff tactic and only showing trading results, you could also show them the trades that resulted to the daily profit. Some traders have used twitter as a platform for recording their trades and using it for future proof. (You'd need to do this in life time, so maybe a bot connected to your trading accounts would be better.)

So there you have it, ways to prove that both your investing options are not ponzis. What's your excuse for just presenting the end of the day results?

Also, why is there a shadowscripts logo in BT's about page? You know those guys sell HYIP scripts right? Roll Eyes

So far we are doing an audit that will be done by end of August. We have tried some of your other suggestions but got criticized that we photoshoped pictures and faked the trading results. The company has decided that the audit is sufficient proof. As for the programming and software: They used a suitable program that works for the intended purposes. What others use it for is none of our business. That's like saying law enforcement cant use guns because guns are used by criminals,so anyone who uses guns must be criminals.
We are doing all we can to prove to people that we make money in the way we say we make money,and hopefully that is enough. Thank you for the suggestions,though,I appreciate that you do not go into attack mode Wink

You know, I keep seeing people state that some ethereal photo exists that people claimed was photoshopped, and yet, with this post that has been around for over 8 months, of which I have read every single post - not a single copy of the said photo have ever surfaced.

So, I'm sorry, but I'm pretty sure that claim is bullshit.

Why don't you post it, I mean, if people already think it's photoshopped, it won't hurt, right?

Who wants to put odds on an excuse why they won't