Quote from: Liquid71 on August 22, 2014, 03:51:07 PM

Quote from: smooth on August 22, 2014, 03:45:34 PM

Quote from: Liquid71 on August 22, 2014, 03:42:15 PM

proven the legit whitepaper was on the tor website

Show me third party verification of the signature and date from 2012 and I'll be impressed. Otherwise what is on the tor website is whatever the owner of that tor website wants it to be. Just more fake documents, in other words.

So you sticking to the claim their website wasn't hacked?

I said I don't believe that "explanation" for the faked whitepapers. The conveniently timed, "We got hacked!" defense is just not credible to me.

I have no proof whether their site was hacked or not hacked or if so who did it.

Quote

I came here becasue I saw cryptonote tweeted that their site was hacked and I thought that was a hillarious defense.

That's because it is.

Quote

Since it was proven in this thread that the whitepaper on the CN clearnet site was indeed a fraudulent copy of the one hosted on the tor

I'm going to say this again because you apparently didn't get it the first time. Nothing is "proven" by a tor web site. The owner of the tor web site can put whatever they wan't on it. Unless there is verifiability through an independent third party (at the least; multiple independent sources of credible corroboratory evidence would be better), it can prove nothing, and in fact proves nothing.

Quote

site the most likely reason for that is it was hacked. Yet you're on here claiming that it wasn't hacked and it's a coin mill with a scorched earth policy towards Monero...it's Monero that has the scorched earth policy with any and everything cryptonote related. You're even shitting on bytecoin code despite the fact that your shitcoin clone is based on the same code, yet XMR is amazing.

You are confused. I never said anything was bad about the Bytecode code. My comments are directed at the scam artists behind the fraudulent 80% premine, fake documents, multiple coins operated by the same crew hidden behind multiple anonymous "developers" names, etc., not the code.