Quote from: sdersdf2 on August 25, 2014, 11:17:10 AM

Quote from: DevCoder on August 25, 2014, 11:11:24 AM

Quote from: sdersdf2 on August 25, 2014, 11:05:24 AM

Quote from: DevCoder on August 25, 2014, 10:57:50 AM

Quote from: battbot on August 24, 2014, 12:36:34 AM

Hello,

For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread).

Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned.

As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code.

Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened.

Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin.

battbot

THE DEV OF CINNICOIN CONFIRMED THIS POST.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8513205#msg8513205

Who cares what CINNIcoin dev says - he is a passive, non-existent, non-dev "dev" who seems to have decided to allow CINNI to die, whatever his reasons. Don't care about him or give any weight to his words.

My post is a direct copy of battbot and rynomster's own words with a clear chronology. For all I know, Cinnicoin is in bed with these guys, figuratively speaking.

When you get out of diapers you will realize the world is a little more complex than you see it now. Situations change with time.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8142514#msg8142514

"I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best."

-rynomster

I leave it to readers to read what these two had to say and when in their own words, as it happened. I'm not interested in what battbot and rynomster have to say now to try to make themselves look better and protect their new or future investments. I'm just documenting the history while they, their proxies and guys like you try to whitewash it.

Unlike you, I don't have to insult anyone - I can simply let readers come to their own judgements and visit the links if they like.

Ok. I'm saying grow up, situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the cinnidev so he made his own coin to implement those ideas. You are on a smear campaign against the wrong guy for the wrong reasons. Grow up!