Quote from: Chris001 on August 25, 2014, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: MineP.it on August 25, 2014, 01:29:02 PM

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on August 25, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Quote from: Gladimor on August 25, 2014, 12:15:28 AM

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on August 25, 2014, 12:02:06 AM

Really bad move on Bittrex part if they fail to execute the deal because buyers had a change of heart.

~BCX~ (totally correct)

It's called doing the right thing.

Snipped a lot of text trying to support position

That's just a matter of perspective and your own unproven fears.

Has anyone proven this is a scam?

It's not Bittrex's position to determine what is a scam and what is not.

~BCX~

That's just a matter of perspective too. Some would disagree with your view.

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on August 25, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

They are simply the escrow.

The escrow is there to ensure a service/product is delivered before the money is released to the provider. If Bittrex willingly release those funds knowing full well that the product/service won't be delivered then they have failed in their escrow duty. No?

Bittrex has to follow TO THE LETTER the terms of the escrow agreement.

They simply look at the agreement, then look at if that agreement was met.

IF the terms are met, they release the BTC to the dev

IF the terms are not met, they dont

IT IS THAT SIMPLE

I am so sick of people asking/expecting Bittrex to just break the agreement because this Cluster dev because it looks like he is a scammer.

Bittrex has a job to do. Their job is to follow the agreement TO THE LETTER.

I lost, or Im pretty sure that I'm going to lose a decent amount of BTC because of this.

But I would be and idiot if I expected Bittrex to commit a god damn felony and break the terms of the the agreement to save my ass.

ALL I had to do was look up the post history of the cluster coin dev and I would have known right then and there that it was a scam.

I DIDNT = I LOSE

It was my carelessness that caused me to lose my BTC. I don't even blame the damn dev, yeah hes an ass hole, but it was me who was lazy and I learned an expensive lesson on this one.

You people who are asking Bittrex to break the law to save your ass because you didn't do your due diligence are complete idiots.

They claimed the terms are informal. And they were agreed to modify the terms to add POD must be done. Therefore, they can help us more like adding more strict terms to avoid a scam because they can talk with the scam dev. BTW, if it is a scam, bittrex will also take responsibilities because they host the ICO