Quote from: DevCoder on August 25, 2014, 03:37:18 PM

Quote from: sdersdf2 on August 25, 2014, 03:34:39 PM

Quote from: pawlo74 on August 25, 2014, 03:30:13 PM

Quote from: sdersdf2 on August 25, 2014, 03:23:42 PM

Quote from: pawlo74 on August 25, 2014, 03:21:30 PM

Quote from: DevCoder on August 25, 2014, 03:17:06 PM

Quote from: pawlo74 on August 25, 2014, 03:11:32 PM

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?

I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is.

Sorry DevCode but:

Rynomster is a coder so he is even worst than battbot he knew about all problems with Cinni code but he didn't say anything and left in silence.

How you call it HONESTY ?

I didn't even focus on the bug issue - the anon tech stuff alone is damning - but good point.

No. That is the point Rynomster fixed MAJOR Cinni Pos bug.

Is that makes him honest ?

I guess I consider the anon tech the "original sin", and I'm much more familiar with the facts in that story, but you're right - from what little I've read of the bug allegations, including what rynomster told cryptoasian, that bug issue might be a much bigger, much more serious and much more fundamental issue than the anon tech issue I'm most familiar with.

If the facts on that matter are 100%, feel free to post another thread to get the truth out there.

Even cinnidev said rynomaster fixed the one staking bug. There are many more because cinni code is garbage. You are such tools.

DevCove please ask digit about it I think he is an expert with that issue.

And that is why all started.