Quote from: dyask on August 26, 2014, 12:18:22 PM

Quote from: Elenelen on August 26, 2014, 12:05:23 PM

Quote from: dyask on August 26, 2014, 11:53:28 AM

Quote from: Elenelen on August 26, 2014, 11:42:06 AM

Quote from: Honeycutt22 on August 26, 2014, 11:17:07 AM

..... Not one negative post has any kind of proof or qualifying date to indicate scam.

But where is the proof that it isn't a scam? The only thing subscribers to this Haslett-thing can show are their daily payments, and a lot of cool-aid talk from the CEO, who keeps his cards to his chest... this all fits into a Ponzi just well (payments come from new subscribers)... There is no hard evidence about a real existing mining-farm (CEO hasn't shown any proof) or working Haslets (we saw only a picture of one case).

This CEO can easily clear up things by showing real evidence, but instead he does the opposite (deletes posts, and sends out more cool-aid). His last marketing trick: "the $20 increase didn't slowdown the entries, so we will raise it next week again" in other words: quick, quick! buy more now before you pay more next week.....

You are not making any sense. A Ponzi only works when no one knows who is running it. When the owners are known, they end up in prison. In this case the CEO of GAWMining is well known and very public. There is no chance for a successful Ponzi scheme. Still that doesn't mean everything is on the up and up. Clearly there are a lot of unknowns and we don't really know what these Hashlets really are.

I agree, he is playing with his freedom (just like Madoff...or the Russian Sergei Mavrodi who did it twice !).
But how well known is this guy really (I didn't any research yet..) is his address known and his current whereabouts? He might be already working from a country without extradition-treaty to the USA. Who knows?

You really need to take off the tinfoil hat, it is keeping you from thinking. If you live in the states he is in the same country and you can go to GAWMiners headquarters and visit his office. He is in tons of pictures with people in the states. It is save to say he is working from the states.

I think you have some valid points but the noise of your wild assertions is clouding out the good stuff.

So, what you are saying is that, if you saw photos showing someone and his friends in the States. That person must be a good honest guy and cannot run anything dodgy. Valid Points?