Quote from: Stargazer on August 30, 2014, 09:00:21 PM

Quote from: rdyoung on August 30, 2014, 08:46:49 PM

Quote from: Stargazer on August 30, 2014, 08:42:44 PM

Quote from: rdyoung on August 30, 2014, 08:01:31 PM

Without knowing any background, how could you have "known" Huh

?
I still believe that the at the very least, the hashlets in the wild now are backed by hardware, the vaultbreakers are/were 750mhs a piece and while its hard to tell size in a photoshop mockup, it appears to fit in a u2 or u3 rack.

A member of hashtalk created this site https://xively.com/feeds/1229182496
If that # is representative of hardware, 482 vaultbreakers @ 750 each is all thats needed for the current poolsize.

Again, I do believe the hardware is real, what I have issue with is how josh lacks to explain anything in any more detail than, we make you lots more muny than the udders doo. As I have had time to process all of this I am beginning to lean towards the idea that josh and his board, etc are just out of their depths. They saw a market they could dominate by tossing millions at without educating themselves on the fundamentals, nor how to actually interact with and explain your offering to those customers who are smarter than your average bear.

When they showed the pictures people started saying that they are pretty and asking if they'll look like this and someone responded that this is just a presentation and the original miners are completely different. Anyway people didn't need much time to sort this out.

I think Vaultbreakers don't exist yet, but I haven't seen GAW say otherwise. They also said that you'll be getting free hash while waiting for the product so I can't see anything bad here.

I've read that thread that got closed yesterday and seen people on hashtalk say that the questions weren't answered because you were violating the rules and stuff, so maybe you could choose a person that isn't banned yet and make him post a really polite request. Hold the sarcasm and threats, and we'll see if you get banned for it. If you do maybe I'll change my mind about the whole thing.

I am not sure what side of this issue your on. Your posts are continually contrary to the last one. As for the violating rules and stuff, thats a bunch of hokem. They didn't like that we were asking the tougher questions and expecting a response, the only way to deal with that is to lock a thread and then ban the "culprits". A polite question isn't going to get answered, my questions were polite and volders response was "If you don't trust gaw, then isn't for you". You can't get through that cult mentality with politeness, you have to be unrelenting if you want answers.

Do you really think you were polite? I remember you offended the moderators in your first post. It's their playground, play by their rules!

Really? Please show me where I offended the mods in the first post? I did kindly ask volder to let the adults get some work done if he couldn't answer my questions, that shouldn't be offensive, thats the PC way of saying fuck off.
I also did reply to someone trolling with something that could be deemed offensive if you were a toddler. Its obvious that the people I was engaged in over there can't handle the use of comparisons and examples in an attempt to make a point. If I said a squash is kind of like a pumpkin, they would think I was calling them a pumpkin.