Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite | 1st mini-blockchain coin | M7 PoW | No Premine
by
iCEBREAKER
on 01/09/2014, 05:52:56 UTC
BiteKoin would be pronounced exactly the same way as ByteCoin, and in that case I do see an issue. But there is no other coin pronounced exactly like Cryptonite so it's harder to confuse.

Cryptonite is pronounced exactly the same as CryptoNight, the proof-of-work algorithm used by most of the CryptoNote coins.

It is confusing. I told you this before the coin launched. If you don''t care (it's not the name of a coin), that's one thing. If you are now saying that you want to use confusion as a deliberate marketing strategy, that seems pretty scumbag to me. I don't recommend it.

I regret not participating in the naming conversation earlier this summer, so I could have concurred with smooth on this point.

But the scumbag accusation is too harsh.  BF isn't a scumbag, he's just being stubborn (which is a *good* thing) and reaching for reasons to avoid doing something that's a hassle and costs time needed for other projects.

Exactly, there isn't even a coin called Cryptonote, they just use Cryptonote technology. So we have some algorithms which might be confused with our coin, I don't see why that's so bad.

You don't see why that's so bad?  Umm, it's bad because Reasons and stuff...   Grin

I already crossposted an on-point example of why, from another thread where I tried to tell a noob about XCN and he automatically and understandably lumped XCN in with BBR and XMR.

XCN has fantastic technology that BBR/XMR can't match - mini-blockchain and unmalleable zero-confirmation safe transactions.

There is no (Great) reason to let those amazing unique qualities be obfuscated by undue association with the CryptonOte coins.

Please take off your #1 MBC Guy Hat, and look at the situation from the POV of an intelligent but underinformed noob.  I don't like seeing this great project needlessly hobbled by an entirely avoidable cases of mistaken identity.

At this still-very-early point the confusion is already actual, not theoretical.  When XCN becomes more well known, the confusion will be 1000 times worse.

You've done a perfect job of shepherding XMR XCN development so far and it pains me to see you making an unforced branding error.  Nobody can be an expert in everything.  Stand firm on technical issues, but consider listening to the chorus with regards to marketing and be flexible in your response.