Quote from: smooth on September 02, 2014, 12:31:41 PM

Quote from: DreamSpace on September 02, 2014, 11:39:48 AM

Quote from: smooth on September 01, 2014, 11:07:25 PM

Quote from: CoolGecko on September 01, 2014, 05:01:20 PM

Quote from: MadridReal on September 01, 2014, 04:33:57 PM

Devs, do you remember about a Quazarcoin? I would like to see some updates, which will indicates that the coin isn't dead

They recently developed a GUI wallet, which is a major thing. But they haven't changed their github pages for 2 months. People who go to github to see how active the developers are will get the impression that they aren't doing much. For that reason I think it's important to keep github up to date with he latest improvements. Unless there is a reason not to, the new wallet should be included on github. Even if it's currently at the alpha stage, it can be put on github and labelled alpha.

The GUI wallet was not "recently developed." It was released on June 6, and recently rereleased. There is no real development going on here. The lead developer pops in every once in a while and makes some posts, what he does the rest of the time I have no idea, but it has little to do with the coin.

The thread itself is kept alive by a series of one- or two-line posts that are almost always devoid of real content (usually some form of cheerleading or inane comment). I have no idea if these are deliberate sock puppets or bots that are mining post counts for sig campaigns. Almost certainly one or the other (or both).

You are witnessing a coin-mill clone coin in the caretaker phase. More info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0

are you not in the monero dev team and you have the need to make this post here?
i thought you are smooth and not ugly, but nice to know.

and to your link, its about the shady origin of bytecoin and has nothing to do with quazarcoin.
but the article is like propaganda against all other cryptonotes, of course with exception of monero (such a random).

and finally you say that here are only sockpuppets posting, lol whats wrong with you?

Monero looks from day to day more shady for me, the aggresive behaviour of the community, the whales which i think controlling the market nearly complete and im sure at one point they want to cash out or move to a better opportunity, leaving the small fishes alone, the extreme emission curve which is only nice for the very early miners and so on..

1. The link is relevant because it explained how QCN and a bunch of other coins are all run by the same shady CryptoNote people behind the bytecoin scam. Monero obviously is not, and this is not "random" since its developers are all well known in the community and some even go by their real identities. Which of the shady Cryptonote clone coins has developers using real identities?

2. The link is also directly relevant because the QCN developer posted on that thread explaining how the wallet was developed for QCN back in June (I mistakenly thought it was developed for XMR first, but that was wrong and I corrected that).

3. I see mostly sock puppets posting here. That is a fact.

4. If you enjoy QCN have fun with it, in fact you might as well take over developing it, because no one else is really doing much.

5. Why try to change the subject to (your opinion about) Monero? Did I mention Monero at all? Did I try to promote it? Answer: No to all of the above. I responded to a comment about the GUI and the amount of development happening here that I felt was misleading, and I explained my the background for my opinion by referring to rethink-your-strategy's research. Simple as that.

i tried to read most of the linked stuff, but i am not finished with all, but it looks really like a cryptonote war, and we know the truth is the first casualty of war.

to point 1.)
please explain me where you see a proof that the dev of quazarcoin is connected to bytecoin?
i can't find one, he did a fork, monero was a fork, so what is the problem?
and additional how can it be a scam? there is no premine, not even a emission curve, which favours early miners extraordinary.
so please explain, i am really interested in your answer.

to point 2.)
to be honest i don't get it, whats the point here (english is not my native language) ?

to point 3.)
should i answer this... not really, but yes could be more activity here.

to point 4.)
i have no time at all, but as i see the quazarcoin dev is doing what he is promising and also just in time.
as example i asked if there is a linux-gui wallet available, and few days later it was available, nice

to point 5.)
read your last post and therefore my first sentence of my answer was:
"are you not in the monero dev team and you have the need to make this post here?",
i respect your opinion, but the sound makes the music.