Quote from: bl4kjaguar on September 02, 2014, 02:35:00 PM

Quote from: organofcorti on September 01, 2014, 07:21:55 AM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on August 30, 2014, 05:18:36 PM

Quote from: organofcorti on August 30, 2014, 05:11:39 PM

No, you just linked to someone's Facebook page.

I want *you* to prove your statement to me, not just link somewhere else. That's just plain lazy. Explain it to me here and now, step by step. Please.

Please understand that you have to take initiative with respect to my references. A collection of videos on Facebook is no different from a collection of videos anywhere else.

So, you want me to take the time to watch your videos and read your references without it affecting your spare time at all? I don't think so!

Why not show that you understand the material to which you link by presenting and explaining each item, one per post? Then we can discuss each piece of evidence as you present it. I think that would be much more fair.

There is no fair exchange when it comes to commerce (exchange of knowledge); someone will always get the shaft.

If you are not interested in what I am posting, then do not bother replying; the world does not need any more argumentative people! Especially those who argue before bothering to read even a line of the referenced material!!

It is not acceptable that you want *me* to explain it *for you*
when the people on that page know far better than I do
and you will know best of all once you educate yourself, right?
Furthermore, those people are interested in the topic and will gladly point you in the right direction if you are confused and interested in getting at the truth!
But here in this thread, you are not confused about anything!
You just want me to spoon-feed you the facts about the big three?
I do not have the time nor the interest for that,
so go elsewhere if
you are still trying to get info about actors and hoaxes.

My mistake. It thought you were trying to educate and discuss, not just to point to links and suggest people read for themselves. If that's the case, fine. I'm not interested in spending time on something that seems incredibly unlikely.

If I told you that the president of Kyrgyzstan is actually an android remote controlled by Godzilla, and presented you with links and photographs purporting to be proof, would you bother spending your minimal spare time on it?

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on September 02, 2014, 02:35:00 PM

Actually, I posted some photographic evidence (2 verifiable photos) and video evidence which you never addressed. Why do you ask me to start from the beginning when I have already proven my point with the media that I posted in this very thread?

So to summarize: Why exactly are you denying the verifiable information I have provided?

What is a "verifiable photo? How do I go about verifying the photos?

Why do you think I should accept something if I cannot verify it myself?