Quote from: k-meister on September 04, 2014, 08:07:31 AM

Quote from: yibitecom on September 04, 2014, 05:20:06 AM

Quote from: MaxOnBit on September 04, 2014, 05:13:45 AM

I will follow this

Quote

Once we stop this hardfork (community agreeing of course!), the dev has agreed to continue development as usual. (this is Talkcoin rather than TalkTeam)
If you guys agree with not letting these guys take our coin, I would like you to say so. We will then contact the exchanges and pools to make sure they're using the official code and this crap should all be over.

contact the exchanges and pools asap

my suggestion:We will choose the best wallet version rather than a team.

BTW:the new v2 wallet have a 3% tax fee and the coins used on chatting in the walllet will send to them too?it's not a good sight.they will pump the coins of course.

Of course ,I will write to the exchanges and pools to prevent them accept the v2 version.
and,anyone post the email of those exchanges and pools ? thanks.

Thank-you, this is the contact details of the exchanges and pools. Two of them I don't have email of so you'll have to send a msg on bitcointalk.

bittrex: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=96390
poloniex: contact@poloniex.com

dwarfpool: admin@dwarfpool.com
xhash: support@xhash.net
nonce-pool : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=259723

If you concern about the 3% of new team, read this.
The dev fee is since new voting period (last week) 0.82/16.90 = 4.85%.
You cry about 3% paid for the whole team while ignoring about almost 5% for one person. It's hilarious.

Quote from: AizenSou on September 04, 2014, 07:33:51 AM

Quote from: Ignition75 on September 04, 2014, 06:55:16 AM

You need to stop making out that we are a sinister bunch of people.

The original dev had already said to Andy "All features complete, no more development", Andy (Talkteam) didn't hear from the dev for about a month after that.

I also had a few interesting conversations with the original dev, which left me with an uneasy feeling.

An independent code review was done and well, you know the rest.

We discussed long and hard about reducing the block reward, however we have already tried this in the past and miners left us in large quantities, it's not in the best interests of the coin long term. This has been proven.

Ignore that guy at best, Chris. He showed his support towards the team with the new update

Quote from: k-meister on August 23, 2014, 11:32:03 AM

Thanks for the update, its great to see the coin being taken over and looked after and Im sure everyone appreciates your effort.

Then he pissed off because the block reward doesn't work the way he wants to, so he posts a lot of shits.
k-meister if you take so much time to research about Talkcoin, why don't you pay attention to this:

- votedev could vote to 100% from the start
https://github.com/talkcoin/talkcoin-wallet/blob/8c71e9971a6ca478f2cf8f97e95d08cf47183b76/src/rpcwallet.cpp

Code:

if (fHelp || params.size() != 1)
   throw runtime_error(
   "votedev \n"
   "Percentage to be given to developers 0-100");

   if (nSubsidy <= 0)
   throw JSONRPCError(RPC_CLIENT_NOT_CONNECTED, "Invalid Subsidy");

   if (!(params[0].get_real() >= 0 && params[0].get_real() <=100))
   throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Invalid Percentage");

   int64 nVote2 = nSubsidy * params[0].get_real() / 100;

- after secretly acquiring a lot of TAC without saying anyone (up to more than 30% in one voting period) and being scared of found out due to the block explorer available, he changed to 10% with version 1.1
https://github.com/talkcoin/talkcoin-wallet/blob/2dd6630c5bbda9d1c6559e8f8b696230961a8ae0/src/rpcwallet.cpp

- he changed again to 5% with version 1.3
https://github.com/talkcoin/talkcoin-wallet/blob/3eea265abdc6f7374ce198a258e72c3172e8fbe1/src/rpcwallet.cpp

Actually the fee stays at 3.9% for the whole time after we paid attention to this matter, it's never 3%.

Do you think the new team still willing to work with a person like that ? I doubt.