Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 04, 2014, 05:47:47 PM

Quote from: AnonyMint on September 04, 2014, 05:38:01 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 04, 2014, 05:20:54 PM

only one talks about psychic computer models and fails to see why others find that lulzy.

As with the Climate Change Cult, such a modeling fetish emulates traditional numerology.

Logic: your foot hurts and you have to pee. Thus hurt feet causes peeing.

I told you upthread it is a model that has been trained on $100 million of data. It has identified all the repeating cycles in the history of man. It has been backtested and now also extensively predictively tested.

It has nothing in common with the nonsense climate models, which Armstrong explicits criticizes because those climate models use only near-term data and totally ignore historical cycles that have a longer period than the short-term data they employed.

If you are not even going to take the time to investigate, then shut up because you are making a fool of yourself.

Wow, 100 million is a very big, powerful number of dollars. Shocked

How could it possibly fail to predict at least a few things, once in a while? Maybe I should "take the time to investigate" Nostradamus as well, after all he predicted WW2, the JFK assassination, and 9/11.

/numerology
/sharpshooter fallacy

You are such an idiot.

You have massive category errors.

Nostradamus did not specifically predict those events. You can take some vague pronouncements or numerology and fit it to numerous possible events.

Whereas, Armstrong made specific predictions of specific events at specific times, that could not match any other events. And he was never wrong about long-term predictions. Never. In fact, he has made the point that the longer-term the prediction, the more certain it is.

You are going to need to recalibrate your mind to the reality of what is possible.

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic-- Arthur C. Clarke.