Quote from: RedZeppelin on September 06, 2014, 03:31:08 AM

Quote from: HoldTheLine on September 06, 2014, 02:51:10 AM

Quote from: RedZeppelin on September 06, 2014, 02:42:45 AM

Quote from: HoldTheLine on September 06, 2014, 02:20:19 AM

It is NOT a fair solution, nor is it a legal solution. It is sound law in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Great Britain that ALL shareholders (all those who hold CLD) are to be treated equally and when dividends are paid out they must all be paid out at the same rate per share.

Cmon dont you guys also have A-stocks and B-stocks in some companys where the A-stocks often are higher valued, may pay out a higher amount / stock yearly and also have alot more voting power within the company per stock compared to B-stocks.
This is no school yard democracy here where each and everyone gets equal time on the swings, this is the wild west of cryptos.
If seen from a legal point it would be the ICO holders that should complain.
12% for ICO & for 12% none ICO is "fair", that is even very generous by Xcloudcoin and ICO`s.

Read the rest of the message you quoted pal.

Yes its simple the ICO coins acts as A-stocks as long as they remain intact in their wallets, if moved they become B-stocks.

Too complicated. All CLD is to be valued the same, all profit is to be shared equally among those that met the threshold. It ain't a tricky decision- let get it sorted already dev - the coin is getting dumped.