Quote from: EcuaMobi on December 13, 2015, 03:01:39 PM

Quote from: node.jps on December 13, 2015, 02:55:46 PM

this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=774120.0

TBH I don't know about that case. But a dice site is not an obvious scam until proved otherwise. Did he promote it even after it was an obvious a proven scam? I see he updated a previous positive trust to neutral after the scam was found.

On the other hand anything that "guarantees" always doubling your coins is an obvious scam.

To make it short: promoting a known/obvious scam deserves negative trust. Therefore I'm adding negative trust to you now. If you can prove without any doubts shorena was promoting that dice site after the scam was proved above reasonable doubt then I'll add negative trust to him too. Sounds fair?

this sounds fair

Quote from: shorena on September 12, 2014, 12:04:36 PM

Quote from: Stunna on September 08, 2014, 12:12:16 AM

User Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355700

The discussion starts around here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=716312.msg8715769#msg8715769

Basic summary: A two part scam

Website was caught skipping nonces to rig rolls. This would in effect allow them to maintain a 1% house edge profit for investors, thus attract more and more investments while allowing them to still skim the site investors of all legitimate profits made. Individual users such as stars have told me that they are owed 50+ coins.

Their defense:

They claim that a new rogue developer they hired was rigging the rolls to scam them but around 2 days before the incident there is proof of them saying that the only people involved are the original two: http://i.imgur.com/SJvuc1Q.png (refutes their argument)

Example of one of the scams:

User stars was scammed 60+ coins according to Dooglus: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=716312.msg8721251#msg8721251

As a result of this around 4000-5000 coins have already been divested. 100s of coins are owed to people who placed wagers. They still appear to be honoring divestments though so I recommend divesting your funds for the time being.

Update 1: chat on dicebitcoin is now disabled and they are refusing to return a lot of owed funds.

Since this thread is used to give me negative trust by

Quote from: haploid23 on September 11, 2014, 12:22:15 PM

Ah, trade fortress, the beacon of morality Roll Eyes

I will post my arguments here.
~~snip~~

I agreed to wear their signature for a months and I will honor my agreement.

ok, you can add the negative to his profile now