Quote from: jaysabi on September 09, 2014, 01:24:25 PM

Quote from: smalltimer50 on September 09, 2014, 12:10:51 PM

I still can't believe Dooglus and others actually believe that Matteo could have been a legitimate whale. Are you kidding me? Just the math + the timing alone is 99% of the proof you need.

I guess the other 1% would be ACTUAL EVIDENCE then. Suspicious timing is not evidence. Someone winning is not evidence. Someone winning at a suspicious time is not evidence. I believe Matteo was an inside job too, the difference is I'm leaving open the possibility it wasn't. All this BS talk of improbability and unlikeliness and suspicious timing is just unsubstantiated speculation. Under the broken logic and dubious math you're all using, you know what else is suspicious? Everyone who's ever won the Powerball. It's SO suspicious that anyone would play or win a game with a 0% game of winning!

Don't confuse someone who knows the difference between suspicious circumstances and evidence as someone who believes Matteo and manl are two different people. Just because you've convicted manl with missing pieces of information and while high on emotion and based on speculation doesn't mean everyone has such a low threshold for judgment.

I believe Matteo was an inside job, but I also acknowledge the possibility he was legitimate. It can't be worse odds than winning the Powerball.

Lol, it's more like 1000%

Not unplugging the site while he was playing would be like a banker witnessing a heist and not calling the cops.