Quote from: KimmyF on September 11, 2014, 06:21:08 PM

Quote from: synechist on September 11, 2014, 06:05:55 PM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on September 11, 2014, 05:53:21 PM

Quote from: synechist on September 11, 2014, 05:47:58 PM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on September 11, 2014, 05:43:04 PM

Quote from: synechist on September 11, 2014, 05:35:52 PM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on September 11, 2014, 05:10:15 PM

Quote from: synechist on September 11, 2014, 04:56:52 PM

Quote from: Teka on September 11, 2014, 04:55:04 PM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on September 11, 2014, 04:50:12 PM

Quote from: synechist on September 11, 2014, 04:45:54 PM

Quote from: cryptico on September 11, 2014, 04:16:55 PM

Quote from: pookielax31 on September 11, 2014, 04:04:05 PM

So when this REV2 is release we will be getting paid For our Xnodes now/X mixer whatever were calling it

Hello I was wondering if for the xnode you will need it to run in a single wallet with 1000 xc or can you have multiple xnodes in a single wallet putting 1000 xc in different addresses?

Yes nodes with a dedicated address containing 1000 XC will receive revenue for trustlessly forwarding transactions.

You can run as many wallets as you like. You'd need a virtualisation environment to do this on a single computer.

Do the wallets still need separate public IP or just different VM and single IP is fine?

Yes they still do.

Run them all over TOR.

Oh boy... I think I will need some more bandwidth. Might get some VM from azure or amazon or something...

Heh. Bring on the tx revenue!

Any chance Dan can make it so that say you have multiple input/address that adds to up more than 1000 XC to act as a xmixer rather than separate wallets? Say you have 50k in a wallet, then it acts like 50 Xmixers rather than needing to run 50 separate wallets??

I doubt that'll be a good idea in terms of the blockchain. It's not a good idea to run multiple copies of your wallet.dat and then spend from both. You can corrupt the wallet.dat.

Xmixers will be continually receiving and sending fragments. Imagine how much higher the chances of corrupting your wallet would be with that!

In any case, having several wallets, each with a smaller balance, is more secure. If I had 50k I'd certainly spread them around a bit. :-)

But... The need to run like 100 to 200 or more wallets... Omg... The number of VM that's needed is insane.

I am just saying if you have inputs that are 1000 XC that it's automatically treated as one xmixer since the mixing is based on UTXO unspent output anyway.

Indeed, that amount of VM would be hectic.

I wonder if this will be possible... mixing involves continually creating new addresses that fragments are paid to/from, and so the inputs/outputs are multiple and not just a single 1000 XC address.

Conceivably a mixer could get more transactions simply by having more coins available for mixing... and also more network speed, processing power, etc. Perhaps a single mixer could have 50k in it and be on a big server somewhere and thereby generate more revenue. However, I think this would centralise the network dangerously.

On the other hand, I'm all for incentivising nodes to perform better. Quicker service, or fewer issues, etc. might be pretty important in a web 3.0/blockchain 2.0 scenario.

Atm I'm more looking for answers on two questions
If I have a wallet with more then 1K coins, can I somehow isolate those 1K coins from the rest so they can stake? Like the previous version with the xmixer address.

And what kind of revenue will be paid,?
before people start mixing (and reset coinage all the time) they need to get more than just staking, eg over 34xc a year

At the moment, since your 1000 XC will be fragmenting and moving from address to address all the time, you won't be able to isolate your other balances from the coins you use for mixing.

So you'll need to keep a personal wallet.dat, and a separate wallet.dat for a mixing node.

You're right that coin-age will reset all the time, and so you won't stake your 1000 XC. It will be more profitable to use your 1000 XC to trustlessly forward transactions.

I don't have figures on what the revenues will be at this stage. We'll release those details soon.