Quote from: RoadStress on September 12, 2014, 11:29:51 AM

Quote from: trek27 on September 12, 2014, 10:51:37 AM

Yes, this is very interesting.
However, for the moment, FC should be 100% concentrated on getting AM on track in current model (chips, miners, self-mining) - just a matter of priority.
When AM claims, in sustainable way, let's say equivalent of 25%-30% of network hashrate, then such ideas could be absolutely great for the more distant future.

In my view AM has already lost the mining game with both miners sold to customers and the self-mining. I mean Bitfury who started later than AM has/had ~40%-50% of the network hashrate at one point just a few months ago. Even KnC started with one 10MW DC and now they have 3 DCs. If they can do it then AM, who had the head start could do it too, but at this point they just don't matter. Call it trolling or whatever, but it's just my opinion based on what's going on: low sales, no information about the self-mining hashrate. As always feel free to contradict me with facts instead of calling me names.

FACT: You don't have any information to be making the claim that miners are not selling as well as expected. You don't have the necessary info to backup the majority of your claims.
FACT: You keep making stuff up and presenting it as facts when it's actually just opinion.
FACT: With PSU and shipping included, 3 Tubes costs less than a single SP20 and will provide 2.4 Th/s compared to 1.7 Th/s.