Quote from: PilotofBTC on September 13, 2014, 02:55:17 AM

Quote from: ChrisSommer on September 13, 2014, 02:08:34 AM

Quote from: jl777 on September 13, 2014, 01:56:48 AM

I finally got a test environment where two separate nodes are properly communicating the SuperNET at the lowest protocol levels. So I can debug the proper processing and even some functionality between the two nodes

still having some build issues on the third server, but going from loopback to two different servers will get almost all the cases that are needed.

So, this weekend, I might be slower than usual to respond to any posts. Expect the trolls to seize this opportunity to attempt to spread the FUD. I will be closing my browser so any non-response is just because I am too busy. You can always tell them to bet against the SuperNET if they are so sure it wont work

James

James, I have this idea in the back of my head for a while.
Think about a decentralized web hosting service, running on sidechains. Can fit the best with SuperNET.

Lets imagine UNITY-WEB:
- premium decentralized hosting service- not so cheap;
- pay X amount to register a domain/hosting account, which can ONLY be accessed into the NXT wallet, for example;
- have your website/content/secret docs uploaded on your hosting/domain account;
- have an option to make it public or password protected;

Lets imagine UNITY-WEB as a decentralized WWW which is separated, no more govs killing your website/services.

The asset is priced at a fixed BTC cost. The NXT price is adjusted based on the NXT/BTC ratio. NXT has gained about 30% since the IPO started.

So, the price is actually higher in BTC, and goes up a bit each day.

Thanks for the explanation, that makes sense.