Quote from: RB14060 on September 13, 2014, 02:37:17 PM

Quote from: BurtW on September 13, 2014, 12:11:38 PM

Yes, I have verified that even though they made some sort of cut and paste mistake in their post, RB14060's MinAddress of 1a355-1ci is now the one to beat (signature verified and the address has funds).

Huh, not quite sure how that happened! Must've been a change address or something, cause I don't see it in my client nor does it show up in an address sweep. Oh well!

You must have used the private key of 1a355-1ci = 1CiunxVSGagXxowVVkrbcHrUTXx9tohCAG to sign the message in your post otherwise I would not have been able to verify the signed message with the public key for 1a355-1ci = 1CiunxVSGagXxowVVkrbcHrUTXx9tohCAG. Therefore you must own the private key for 1a355-1ci.

1a355-1ci is the number to beat. Anyone?