Quote from: mikelitv on September 15, 2014, 07:47:30 PM

I did, thank you Cedivad. Perhaps you have a better proposition than that of LQB? Perhaps instead of killing the deal because of its structure we could have tried to negotiate it in another way that was legally acceptable. So far, we have nothing Cedivad. Nothing at all but more expenses. I don't see how it can be better. Anyone here can see how it is better?

Off course, a deal that could return something is better than nothing. However the alternative to the LB deal is not nothing, assets are being auctioned:

Quote from: will on September 14, 2014, 12:07:54 AM

Hashfast Bankcruptcy
As it stands it's clear that the estate and its assets will be auctioned off in a controlled manner and details regarding the auction will be made available shortly. A further status conference is set for 24 October.

I was going to say that we will see once that process is completed if refusing LB's offer was good or bad, but I don't think that's actually gonna be possible. With all the caveats that LB was putting in place (protection of the new components of the company, that you didn't elect to choose before, Monica for example would have been granted that protection, probably Simon and Edward too; no control over the management of the mine, no guarantee of any kind that the mine would have actually been created, their ability of returning the assets at any time in the future (like 23 months from the beginning of the mine) without having to pay you a dime keeping the profits of the mined, the unlimited license rights, etc).

These were not details that could have been fixed, errors in good faith because their lawyers forgot to protect the creditors, those were there precisely to have the chance to screw you one last time.

Off course, in a perfect world they wouldn't have never done that, and HF would have delivered my miners the day they received the raw wafers. (when was that, again?)