Quote from: fulgurite on September 17, 2014, 03:36:06 AM

Quote from: Revelation on September 16, 2014, 03:46:55 PM

Quote from: bigdog246 on September 16, 2014, 12:00:08 PM

Quote from: Revelation on September 16, 2014, 11:19:04 AM

Quote from: mozzria on September 16, 2014, 11:03:14 AM

Quote from: Revelation on September 16, 2014, 09:45:17 AM

Quote from: mozzria on September 16, 2014, 04:55:59 AM

Quote from: Revelation on September 15, 2014, 08:19:27 PM

Quote from: beitris.dwlul on September 15, 2014, 05:35:39 PM

This is quite interesting, a game developed on a crypto basis. Promising!

The game has nothing to do with crypto atm, the dev is giving promises. Read the white paper and make your own conclusions whether or not this dev is capable of actually delivering anything to crypto world.

We suppose technical innovation is important, so does application. We wish to bring crypto-currency into the area of mobile phone. Player can get crypto-currency through POM and POS Pool can help player to achieve POS mining on mobile phone without synchronizing the block chain.

Do you even have a clue what are you talking about?
Please, prove that you can create something that is crypto related and not copy-paste from existing coins.
It seems to me that you guys don't even understand crypto, you use bunch of words that do not make much sense. I wish some trusted developers of other coins will jump in and comment on your statements. It is so strange that a coin with market cap of almost 1mln USD has no scrutiny from knowledgeable people.
I am gonna try to invite trusted people to take a look at your statements and white paper.

Guys, be careful, the dev can dump on you his premine any time.

Have you read white paper carefully? Three parts in white paper: crypto-currency, game and mobile platform. What you want is technique, but application is here. We really want to know your opinion about POM, MPOS and POS Pool that we mentioned on white paper. If you can invite people to take a look at this project and give us good advice, those people will be rewarded, of course include you.

We know you are worried we are a liar, but we had announced address of premine, you can supervise any time. We will announce everyone before we use it. BTW, we have no plan to use this coins currently.

You have rambled on 21 pages of general phrases and you are babbling about crypto and games in general. There is nothing in your white paper that deserves attention. Because of your white paper and your statements I am becoming more inclined to believe that you do not understand crypto and that you are scammer.
What is your name?
How many people are involved in the project?
What is your studio's name?
Where is the POD?

I called you liar because you've claimed HEFTY1 to be your algo which is not true - HEFTY1 has been developed by heavycoin devs.

are you idiot? What's your purpose?

>> Among algorithms, HEFTY1 is the best algorithm to resist miner recently, which is first used by Heavycoin (HVC) . SHA256, KECCAK512, GROESTL512 and BLAKE512 are also used by HVC for added security. These four algorithms have different principles but no common weakness, and they are recognized algorithms with high safety. Quark, X11 and X13 already implement multiple cryptographic hash functions, but only line up many hash function simply without increasing security against collisions, which will endanger the security of cryptocurrency system if any one of them is attacked by collisions. HVC extracts 64-bit from those four algorithms and gets the final result after combination. Actually, it parallels four algorithms, and only 64-bit under the risk if one algorithm is broke, which means only four algorithms are broke at the same time will risk the security of cryptocurrency system. HEFTY1 is decided to use in MLS and MOZZ cause it is new, unique and safe.

Ok, my bad if they mentioned it in the original version of the white paper. I don't have the original version. The point I was making earlier is that I called dev the liar not because of his premine but because of algo statements. He replied with his premine addresses.

Regardless, who are these devs? Where are they from? They names? Where is the POD?

it's weird, there is just one white paper out there, why you say you don't have the original version ? isn't it the original version?

I read the white paper earlier, it is the original one, part of them has been changed, but the content is the same.