God exists - in your head only.

People 'need' God or a type of 'relation to something greater' to fill in a type of emotional void they are experiencing - they do it to justify that 'their loved ones' aren't gone and that 'we must certainly see them again too when we die!', which is naive and gullible - your personality and traits are predetermined from your environment and your genetic material - ergo you come back every century or so, and for that matter you aren't completely YOU, you're just a reset consciousness that is turned back on through the process of meiosis Roll Eyes

Stop attributing favorable events and circumstances of chance to being a miracle - cause you talking out loud to yourself while holding your hands to a multidimensional being really solves everything.... right???

concept of reincarnation is true
concept of greater beings 'watching over us' without showing or giving any evidence of their own efforts toward self preservation is false

Entrophy = wins
Equilibrium = wins

Thus, Omnipresence implies that God is simply all forms of matter and lack thereof
Thus, Omnipotence implies that God cannot exist because then said God also has all knowledge of outcomes from not being present.

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on September 17, 2014, 04:45:42 AM

Quote from: Vod on September 17, 2014, 04:16:05 AM

I'd have more respect for you people if you had any kind of new evidence in the last 2,000 years.

Quote from: Vod on September 17, 2014, 04:04:51 AM

Quote from: DavidHume on September 17, 2014, 04:03:54 AM

Supernatural is a term used to explain what the science still can not explain. Only closed minded people think science can explain everything and can not think outside the box.

Science can explain everything. Look at all that was unknown when god was first invented. Soon, science will explain everything.

Mainstream scientific consensus is not powerful enough to explain the evidence for survival:

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on September 15, 2014, 09:59:23 PM

Here is one example of high-quality evidence of the survival of the personality:

Quote

Dr. James Hyslop, professor of Logic and Ethics at Columbia University, and one of the most distinguished American psychical researchers, reported the following incident.

[...]

As Sir Wiliam Barrett concluded in his review of the case: "The simplest and most reasonable solution is that the information was derived from the mind of the deceased person."

2 page PDF:
http://www.aeces.info/Top40/Cases_51-75/case56_soule-soul.pdf

Is mainstream science going to give us any information at all on this subject? I challenge you to explain the evidence using consensus theories.

Without timely response, it is affirmed that empirical science CANNOT explain everything.

Serendipitous results without a clearly defined experiment and control group - and this is based on the efforts of one guy, I mean he could have flubbed his findings to make his experiment seem bigger than it was (reality was inconclusive and he lied saying they were correlated) (I'm really going out on a limb with this guess as I didn't bother reading the PDF yet) Will give feedback on it soon.