Quote from: enerbyte on September 20, 2014, 01:45:02 AM

Quote from: jl777 on September 20, 2014, 01:08:58 AM

Yes, boolberry is a very brandable name, but if the person in charge of the marketing is not liking it, then he wont do anywhere as good of a job unless he gets the name he wants.

then this is for one person? I think that if someone goes to work at a company in the area of marketing that does not give you the right to change the name just because you do not like, then what happens when that person leaves and another person comes? also you can change the name if you do not like?

as the community's designated marketing person, it is on behalf of the community that he is making these decisions.

Now I think a lot of people have an opinion on the name because it is easy to have one. Its not like debating about the merits of one type of algorithm over another, a name, now everybody can debate that endlessly. So they do, accomplishing nothing.

Was it my imagination, or wasnt there a lot of complaints about the name? From a marketing standpoint it is hard to sell a child's cereal/toy as a crypto currency.

Now it really doesnt matter what the name is, we all agree the tech is what is important. So, why all the fuss all of a sudden?

windjc stepped up and is willing to put time into marketing this, is anybody else? If he does a good job, then the name thing wont be an issue. It is so easy to complain, well, if Rune is so bad a name, where are the suggestions for others?

If you are all happy at 1/15'th XMR marketcap, then lets just leave everything the way it is. Maybe the name matters, maybe it doesnt, but debating endlessly about the name change is not going to help anything.

Does the community want to support windjc or not? This is what I want to know.

James