Quote from: CoinHumper on September 21, 2014, 12:26:31 AM

Quote from: vuduchyld on September 21, 2014, 12:21:20 AM

Quote from: CoinHumper on September 21, 2014, 12:19:04 AM

Quote from: fluffypony on September 20, 2014, 11:58:47 PM

Quote from: CoinHumper on September 20, 2014, 11:38:38 PM

Just one problem with your theory. The Monero devs, Anonymint and even rpietila have acknowledged bcx exploit is real and they are working on fixing it. My theory is bcx proved it to them and then did not pass on the fix.

We absolutely have NOT said that. We know virtually NONE of the details of the claimed exploit.

So far all that third-parties have produced is a rehash of the research done and released as part of MRL-0001, which can be found here: http://lab.monero.cc/pubs/MRL-0001.pdf

So if you guys are so sure that it is all FUD, why then did rpietila decline to accept bcx 500 BTC challenge? Seems like an easy 500 BTC to me.

It's an asymmetrical information proposition. Why would anybody risk $200K on that? I'm sure he's got plenty riding on the outcome as it is.

More like it is because rpietila has more faith in bcx proven history than than his devs.

Honk if you hate Trolls!