Quote from: Sukrim on May 11, 2012, 10:04:52 AM

Quote from: brendio on May 11, 2012, 09:58:16 AM

Quote from: Nefario on May 11, 2012, 09:09:10 AM

GLBSE is not publicly traded.

Interesting that I was able to sell a share for 10 BTC then. Wink

That's most likely one of the fake shares from GLBSE 1.0 then... You really think Nefario wouldn't even update his own asset page or put up a "contract" of 1 line with a spelling error?

Quote from: server on May 11, 2012, 10:10:43 AM

Quote from: Sukrim on May 11, 2012, 10:04:52 AM

Quote from: brendio on May 11, 2012, 09:58:16 AM

Quote from: Nefario on May 11, 2012, 09:09:10 AM

GLBSE is not publicly traded.

Interesting that I was able to sell a share for 10 BTC then. Wink

That's most likely one of the fake shares from GLBSE 1.0 then... You really think Nefario wouldn't even update his own asset page or put up a "contract" of 1 line with a spelling error?

Nefario said long time ago this was a fake asset, but I wonder why he didn't remove this one just like other fake GLBSE v1 assets. (for example SIN)

Nefario also said a long time ago that despite the asset being fake, he would honour it with shares in GLBSE. I thought it set a bad precedent at the time, given that I had always wanted to invest in GLBSE, but couldn't because it's not public, and I had taken the time to check the signature on the fake asset and realise that it was fake. Nefario's announcement to honour the fake asset meant he was rewarding those who didn't do their homework.