Quote from: MysticalCockFungus on September 24, 2014, 02:16:21 PM

Quote from: cryptoholic11 on September 23, 2014, 08:31:18 PM

Here my thoughts on the subjects discussed.

2. Stake in cryptoxindia. If big holders want a stake in cryptoxindia exchange, then the devs should hold a separate ICO/IPO and give everyone a fresh chance to invest in the comapny/project. Just because some of us were lucky enough to accumulate a bunch of coins at dirt cheap prices shouldnt give us any more reason to hold a stake. It doesnt even make sense for anybody with any amount of coins to hold a stake in the exchange. There is no correlation. Yea its a win win for the holders but a lose a lose for the devs. Its pretty much blackmailing the devs "Hey give us a stake in your exchange or i wont guarantee not to dump and sell significant quantities of SFR." Any stake of a future company (in this case cryptoxindia) should be done through an IPO.

Depending on how much SFR the devs actually own, it can be a very profitable move for them too. If they commit just 5-10% of Cryptoxindia shares into SFR the value of the coin will rise immensely. Trust me, the altcoin world is getting sick of hearing 1 week old coins promising the same old features like "trustless anon" "decentralized market" "decentralized exchange" etc. A coin that allows you to extract profit via dividends from a real exchange that will have real volume and real people will actually use is huge huge news. Probably bigger than anything any other coin has achieved. The level of hype and attention it will get both SFR and the exchange will be worth it. Infact SFR would become the only alt in existence to actually have real intrinsic value.

I completely agree with this. This could be the first exchange that is actually created and handled by an altcoin community.