Quote from: dooglus on September 29, 2014, 06:12:20 PM

Quote from: BBmmBB on September 29, 2014, 05:24:05 PM

no in his description you see the two hash together before the hand, where as now you don't get to see the secret hash until a day after or something right? :\

The fact that you say "secret hash" tells me you still haven't a clue what you're talking about. There is never a secret hash.

Quote from: BBmmBB on September 29, 2014, 05:24:05 PM

..the other thing it's amusing to see how the guy who you say first came up with the "provably fair" nonsense has just recently plead guilty in federal court ! hmmm!!! =O

Not really. He plead guilty to something completely unrelated to fairness. He was never accused of cheating. He was accused of selling shares without being registered with the appropriate government body. You could argue that it is unfair that you have to get government approval to legally sell that which is rightfully yours, but that's not the fairness we're talking about here.

secret meaning unrevealed till after the roll..his example you see a hash of the two house seeds BEFORE the hand so there it would be in fact provably fair!

..as for Eric i dunno how you are trying to spin it , all i'm saying is he is known criminal and this is who you are arguing as the legit originator of your such "fair" system? ROTFLMFAO!!!! Cheesy