Quote from: harding on October 01, 2014, 07:36:41 PM

Quote from: HELP.org on October 01, 2014, 06:07:27 PM

The developers guide already lists the command line arguments. The conf file is a subset of those commands.

Incorrect. The developers reference describes Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) which have nothing to do with the configuration files.

Quote from: HELP.org on October 01, 2014, 06:07:27 PM

Bitcoin.org is also doing a page on running your own node (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/issues/410). ... You are going to need the conf file explanation on that page

Incorrect. I opened the issue proposing that page based on a bitcoin-devel mailing list discussion and, as the issue says, I'm delaying writing that page until there's a setup-free package which allows Bitcoin Core to run as a background service---that means no config file editing will be required.

Quote from: HELP.org on October 01, 2014, 06:07:27 PM

All the information is already within, or will be within, bitcoin.org and there is no purpose in trying to change the Wiki to make a second copy of the same information.

Incorrect, as described above.

Quote from: HELP.org on October 01, 2014, 06:07:27 PM

> if Luke Jr. is going to come in and deny/change the edits so I would not waste my time trying to do that.

Scurrilous. Luke-Jr is the one who suggested you update the Wiki, so he's unlikely to reject a quality contribution.

Quote from: HELP.org on October 01, 2014, 06:07:27 PM

You have already told me the only reason you denied posting the video I had made was because of my "attitude" which is not a legitimate reason.

I disagree. The video promotes your website (Bitcoin.me) and so your behavior is highly relevant. Based on the calumnious statements you've made in the pull request, issues, email correspondence, and this thread, I would recommend people stay away from you and your website.

These are the kind of replies you get from the insiders. If they don't like you so they come up with arguments to leave out important documentation. My issues really don't matter that much but they are going to be doing this stuff to Bitcoin businesses who want wallets and services listed there.

BTW - Harding is upset over miners because they write about making money and he wants no part of that ... even though that is the key incentive for which all of Bitcoin depends. So we have the Saivann, Harding and Luke-Jr making most of the decisions about what goes up on Bitcoin.org. It has good info but it is basically turning into a donation source for the Foundation. Too few people have control over too much of the resources.