Quote from: mr_random on October 01, 2014, 06:22:51 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 01, 2014, 06:12:20 PM

Interesting question but really thats how REV1 worked, REV2's trustless system doesn't allow a node to hold coins and "disappear" - since its an atomic transaction, so if the node drops off in the middle of the TX, then the TX fails and is banned.. Rogue/Bad nodes can't steal coins

Understood. I knew you got the mixing working so it's trustless but I wasn't sure on the details of it.

Quote from: synechist on October 01, 2014, 06:11:34 PM

Thanks Mr_Random. Nice one. Onto it...

P.S. Nodes received the whole transaction, not just the coins. They either sign the whole thing (thereby agreeing to forward coins) or opt out. There's no possibility of stealing.

Cheers.

I'll make a note of what you post on Reddit for future reference.

Only a pleasure.

For the future, some terms you could use where relevant are:

"atomic transaction" - i.e. one that can't be broken into parts, so that, say, coins can't be kept if other bits are left behind.
"multi-party signature transaction" - all parties need to sign in order for the tx to be valid, kind of like m-of-m multisig.