Quote from: georgem on October 03, 2014, 05:25:49 AM

Quote from: g4q34g4qg47ww on October 03, 2014, 05:07:16 AM

Quote from: georgem on October 03, 2014, 04:59:19 AM

First look into the mirror and ask yourself, what sensible arguments do you have that masternodes should recieve EVEN MORE darkcoins than they already do?

Georgem,
Please explain succinctly why miners deserve 4x more of the coins from each block than masternodes do, when masternodes can do the job the miners do, potentially even MUCH MUCH safer than miners do currently?

As I just posted in the darkcointalk forum:

Let's not forget that we need darkcoin to also work without darksend, without anonymity.
There are many reasons why someone will want to show other people a transaction list of an address. For example a donation based charity or something.
Voluntary transparency can be a very valuable function.
I always liked that darkcoin can be BOTH anonymous and not anonymous, depending on the needs of the user.
If we get rid of the miners, we get rid of that, and this would in turn limit the amount of things one can do with darkcoin, wouldn't it?
Even batman turns into bruce wayne by day. Imagine him being batman 24/7... he would probably have commited suicide by now (if he really existed).

...

So, g4q34g4qg47ww, you want as a next step that we don't have any option anymore, right? No option anymore to use or not use darksend depending on our own needs?
No public ledger possibility anymore, right?
You just need you to come clean and tell me what your final goal is here. Don't ask me to be succinct when it is you who makes moves with unforseable consequences.

Where in the heck are you getting that? Having MNs generate the blockchain would have absolutely no affect on the things you named...?? THe blockchain would be just as visible as it ever was, not that anyone could trace transactions anyway.

Try again.