Quote from: laredo7mm on October 03, 2014, 04:15:43 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 03, 2014, 04:11:06 PM

Quote from: laredo7mm on October 03, 2014, 04:09:55 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 03, 2014, 04:03:01 PM

...And I see that you wrote on utility's thread basically asking "if the dev's are serious." Really? This stuff should be done through PM. What do you think the bagholders are going to tell you? And if this is the stage that you are at, you should not be telling us that you are collaborating, or even potentially collaborating with them.

And if he doesn't let the community know what is going on he gets blasted for not communicating well enough.

There is no pleasing the needy here.

As far as I can tell, utilitycoin is a shit coin with an anonymous dev that is 1 week old. Why the hell would XC collaborate with that? I don't care what they attempt to "sell" you. It's just plain stupid.

Where in the quote below do you see where any commitment has been made by Dan?

Quote from: atcsecure on October 03, 2014, 03:43:16 PM

On a side note, I've been contacted by several dev's on a various list of projects - just wanted to keep the community in the loop

* Ruble Code review
* Britcoin - license rev1 mixer code
* Utility Coin - collaboration
* Supernet - collaboration

Ruble code review - this is fine, Dan's code review service does not impact XC's image in a negative way.

Britcoin - don't quite understand this but its probably fine.

Utility Coin - Has no credibility and nothing to distinguish it from the 4-5 other shitcoins that are created weekly, and has an anonymous dev. Dan is "gathering information" by posting questions publicly on their bagholder thread, by which he will only receive biashed shill answers. Information gathering should be done via PM, and information should only be made public to us when a definitive decision has been made. IMO, XC should not even CONSIDER collaborating with a coin that is not established (by the test of time) or one that has an anonymous dev. What is XC going to do when the dev of utilitycoin jumps ship for his next coin? Now XC looks terrible. It's just not wise.

supernet - this is potentially fine, because they are established, past their initial P&D, and do not have anonymous dev's