Quote from: DaveyJones on October 06, 2014, 08:22:32 AM

Quote from: bangomatic on October 06, 2014, 01:14:23 AM

Quote from: DaveyJones on October 05, 2014, 08:57:29 PM

Quote from: CryptoAllDay on October 05, 2014, 08:49:45 PM

Quote from: DentIt on October 05, 2014, 08:43:08 PM

Quote from: CryptoAllDay on October 05, 2014, 08:39:21 PM

it's supposedly trustless anon using ring escrow but pending an audit of course.

So who is that auditor that every user of CLOAK would blindly trust with their money? And how would that be "trustless"? And what would stop the devs from inserting a backdoor into the closed source AFTER the audit? Or would all development stop after the audit?

[21:43:34] <@alty> Well, why not let the community select an auditor then as a first step

Also, I can tell you didn't download or test the new wallet at all since you said it's just a UI redesign when the UI is practically the same.
And that's silly, what would stop ANY closed source coin or software from inserting a backdoor?

Kristov Atlas if he is available?

Dan Metcalf would be a good choice as well.

sure let the main dev of another alt have a look into the code ... you must be kidding me

Kidding? not at all. I would trust his audit. And if you guys want the code to be open source then why wouldnt you want another dev looking at the code? I'd rather see the code audited and if it passes audit then stay closed source until cloak can get rolling again.