Quote from: cooldgamer on October 08, 2014, 06:10:12 PM

Quote from: h4xx0r on October 08, 2014, 06:07:02 PM

Quote from: cooldgamer on October 08, 2014, 05:57:50 PM

Quote from: h4xx0r on October 08, 2014, 05:40:00 PM

Quote from: cooldgamer on October 08, 2014, 05:19:04 PM

Quote from: h4xx0r on October 08, 2014, 04:59:17 PM

Quote from: DiamondCardz on October 08, 2014, 04:54:49 PM

That pisses me off. ANY forum with a trust system where you tried to do that would result in you being instantly slapped down. Buying trust is buying trust on ANY forum with a trust system. Don't whine about the truth.

Umm, ok? if you have a point make it. Seems like you're the one whining about the truth. I never tried to buy trust. i said i thought about it, then i stipulated in my post requesting a trade that we would exchange feedback. that is not the saming thing as "buying trust", you all are trying to find deeper meaning in something as shallow Mozart's grave.

You were obviously trying to farm trust from those trades, no matter how many times you try to say you weren't. You tried to game the system, now you are marked as so. You can still get plenty of trades here by using escrow.

those trades? it was a singular, one time trade, i'm not here to trade cock sucker. you already knew that, and if you didn't well, you're the one calling me out atleast get it right. i was here to get some bitcoin through the trade, and get a positive trust rating. then i planned to offer my services, using the trust rating to help me attract potential clients. here to try and tap the bitcoin economy for extra work. that way if fiat collapses, i already will have inroads here.

Okay, that one trade (although I suspect you would have done the same again or taken up multiple members) You wanted to make a trade for the point of gaining trust, not unlike a rep loan, both of which are scammy behavior.

I'm done here, the rating stays.

You weren't going to remove it either way. I had already apologized to you and you ignored that post, so it goes without saying that that apology is no rescinded.Continuing, you cannot possibly know i would have done another trade again. That reminds me of that movie with Tom Cruise where they charged people with crimes they would commit in the future, but i will digress and defer on that matter, to the more pressing issue:

If this is scammy behaviour, why are Signature Campaign reps not considered scammy?

Ive saw plenty of rep loans btw, look at default trust. half the members on the list have questionable feedback. Look at TF, Blazr, and Vod. Far from model citizens. Remember their account farming operation? how about when Blazr got caught and paid his way out of it? enlisting Vod and others to leave negative feedback on the posters who busted them out? there was never any recourse for either of them on the matter. No punishment for the protected, tsk tsk. Reminds me of corporate america.

To me, it seems we have a system here designed to protect the interest of a select few, and leave the common user on the outside looking in. We need a clearer guideline. It seems one thing is acceptable until the general consensus changes on the matter.

Quote from: h4xx0r on October 07, 2014, 12:26:40 PM

I was thinking of finding reputable hero members and asking them to do trades with me. i would send first, proving i am trustworthy. Really i just want it for bragging rights. My friends at work will be jealous of my green trust rating

Sig campaigns are people providing a legitimate service (advertising) in exchange for BTC. Once the transaction is done people may leave trust. Stunna did not make trusting him a requirement to be part of the sig campaign.

I looked before i leapt with that post. Hence my admission of a mistake. I am not talking about stunna. he is a respected user and is no doubt on the up and up.