Quote from: patrolman on October 08, 2014, 11:14:18 PM

Quote from: robinwilliams on October 08, 2014, 02:43:26 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg9121343#msg9121343

What do we know about "XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ"? Very little really, but it's not somebody who is willing to take credit for finding the exploit. Do we assume that finding this exploit is this person's first encounter with the cryptocurrency world?

Would it be reasonable to suggest that most people would be happy to take credit for finding the exploit? Perhaps somebody who might benefit from Darkcoin being damaged would be interested in finding a bug and reporting it anonymously, somebody invested in another anonymous cryptocurrency, for example. We know very well from one of the posters in this thread that it's not difficult to create sock-puppet accounts to support your case.

One thing we do know, is that "XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ" does not have a reputation to uphold here on bitcointalk. As a result this person can post things which nobody can confirm or deny. For example:

Quote from: XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ on October 07, 2014, 08:49:09 PM

I'm not so good at C++, really.

Throw in a condescending remark about someone who does have a reputation in the crypto community:

Quote from: XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ on October 07, 2014, 08:49:09 PM

Btw, you should hire some real penetration tester, not me or what was the name of that guy?

And of course a parting jab, but with a "nice guy" remark for good measure:

Quote from: XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ on October 07, 2014, 08:49:09 PM

It seems to be more vulnerabilities in darkcoin. Code looks terrible (nothing personal

)

Based on what we actually know about this character, the thread title "darkcoin exploit found in 2 hours by amateur" is impossible to verify and seems sensationalist.

just realized - the hacker\attacker guy writes like jl777 & he would have the motivation (maybe?) o.O