Quote from: Coolstoryteller on October 11, 2014, 01:05:12 AM

Quote from: Viper1 on October 11, 2014, 12:56:06 AM

Quote from: Coolstoryteller on October 11, 2014, 12:48:33 AM

The XST whitepaper was reviewed by some of the bitcoin core devs and they came to the conclusion that it was unfeasible.

The least you can do is be truthful. They didn't say it wasn't feasible and in fact one of them said they didn't have enough information about all potential solutions to actually know or not.

This whole thing is just pathetic. Both sides just spewing off bullshit to suit their own purposes. Grow a fucking spine people and show some ethics in what the hell you say. The number of children in this shit pretending to be adults just pushes me over the edge at times.

Viper1 you are correct, this whole thing is pathetic. It has nothing to do with SDC and everything to do with XST. Longandshort started this investigation by inquiring about the feasibility, not me. In fact, you should take your queries back up with Greg he's the one of the guys who gave his expert opinion on it, not me. I've just been swatting these trolls's baseless scam accusations in this thread.

Answer from Greg Maxwell:
[01:38am] bjjb: If this is truly a work of his passion, maybe he will find a way to make it work. I do appreciate the skeptic professional opinions tonight - they are rare in the trade scene.
[01:40am] nessence joined the chat room.
[01:40am] gmaxwell: You can't really honest effort yourself through something that is just not applicable, and probably not through not knowing what you're doing. ... and you speak of integrity, but launching some speculative asset when you've not done the work? I don't think that is something that speaks of integrity.

Bottom Line:
Devs shouldn't post specs as promises when they haven't done their homework.

You seem to forget I was in that chat. I know exactly what he said and didn't say. I was also in a Monero chat room with the guys that would actually have more information than the bitcoin guys.

I'm certainly not "defending" the Stealthsend stuff as it's pretty clear at this point that even if it gets implemented it has issues and will be questionable as to whether or not it's cryptographically sound. But I just want to see some truths being told and not bullshit.