Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on October 11, 2014, 12:44:51 PM

Quote from: K1773R on October 10, 2014, 06:31:55 AM

Quote from: mathgal23 on October 10, 2014, 06:09:15 AM

http://forum.bleutrade.com/index.php/topic,40.0.html

POSSIBLE ANONCOIN BUG REPORT

Hi. Today we are faced with a problem reported by some Bleutrade users that withdraw his was not working. We found it strange being our lasts withdraws with 0 confirmations. We decided to investigate.

::::: Normal Withdraw Today :::::

   {
   "account" : "",
   "address" : "ALvNv6ydiqNuey129MXJV4tywqBPn9USyW",
   "category" : "send",
   "amount" : -47.78000000,
   "fee" : 0.00000000,
   "confirmations" : 0,
   "txid" : "0013dd6a25d222ceb203b1977d60a7db5f6f9b91c1c186f65517b29abcc8dfbc",
   "time" : 1412854096,
   "timereceived" : 1412854096,
   "comment" : "b w17686 e4050480",
   "to" : "b w17686 e4050480"
   },

0 confirmations? why?...

This transaction also does not appear in explorer. hmm... ok, let's investigate...

For this example, we will use a normal transaction in the original wallet (Another Normal Withdraw, days ago):

   {
   "account" : "",
   "address" : "ASz5NtGjBRjHoP2RPqeCAEcbvm1KC3xwcx",
   "category" : "send",
   "amount" : -446.11059087,
   "fee" : 0.00000000,
   "confirmations" : 65164,
   "blockhash" : "7f5310f1bab45d6157fb4fc00d0f440f1d5db5c6b4d689e72118dce046373512",
   "blockindex" : 2,
   "blocktime" : 1401023096,
   "txid" : "df1298124eb24a0b24dcd80a921e9c60578391bf7eff54241d05760976dd2d07",
   "time" : 1401022562,
   "timereceived" : 1401022562,
   "comment" : "b w2721 e126667",
   "to" : "b w2721 e126667"
   },

First step to test, creating a new wallet.dat with all existing addresses and privkeys.

After RESCAN and REINDEX and CHECKBLOCKS etc..:

:::: SURPRISE :::::

The transaction of example disappears and this appears:

   {
   "account" : "",
   "address" : "AMwxitA4zzi54Ax2kngNnvw8nGChwBDQuh",
   "category" : "send",
   "amount" : -757.03044568,
   "fee" : 0.00000000,
   "confirmations" : 65193,
   "blockhash" : "bc31fcc6c5c333e7efdaadbd088e6873a7e7c7c9007444feccd0b8bb4dc321dc",
   "blockindex" : 1,
   "blocktime" : 1401017947,
   "txid" : "deef70d946477552db8b70aac87fe16a5eb06767fd6668e6e00bca3f4ffceb2c",
   "time" : 1401017947,
   "timereceived" : 1412871290
   },

http://ancblockchain.com/tx/df1298124eb24a0b24dcd80a921e9c60578391bf7eff54241d05760976dd2d07

"AYQWQCixS4cpi4gyc8vVdmrNCzKRsm245J(310.91985481 ANC - Unspent)" - Anonymizer? ok, but...

Our ORIGINAL wallet.dat does not contain the private key or another key or path of 'AYQWQCixS4cpi4gyc8vVdmrNCzKRsm245J'!!!

This is the explanation for non-confirmations of the lasts withdraws. The Blockchain not recognize this and other addresses. Was forgotten in time. This may not have been affected by a forked block, because it is an old transaction.

We can not trust the current app, we does not understand because on send 446.11059087, 310.91985481 ANC lost to a arbitrary nonexistent address in a original wallet.dat! The application is not storing correctly the private keys of anonymizer addresses.

Final Thoughts

We ask immediately withdraw their ANCs from Bleutrade. We do not know what may happen in the future, because this app is not updated over 1 year. We believe that there may exist bug in a hidden zero coin system that does not properly stores the transactions wallet.dat file. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best regards,

Felipe McMont
COO/CTO & Co-Founder
Bleutrade.com

OK. Seems bleutrade is dead now too. They are even more stupid than craptsy...

Actually Cryptsy thinks its is our fault
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.msg8869037#msg8869037

Quote from mullick (Cryptsy):

"Ok lets clear this up once and for all.

I have NOT modified our daemon in anyway. We have built directly from source with no changes. Anoncoind is creating these transaction and paying the large fee required. yet they are not being accepted into the chain. As you can see by my previous post."

Quote from: mullick on August 14, 2014, 07:45:14 PM
Hello everyone,

Im currently investigating an issue with our ANC wallet where the blockchain isnt picking up the majority of our send transactions. We apologize it took us so long to spot the issue. But we are working hard on correcting it and getting the unconfirmed transactions pushed to the blockchain

Some of them get confirmed after a simple restart of the daemon but others do not/ Ill keep everyone informed when I find the solution

Thank you for your patience Smiley

UPDATE:

I think it comes down to transaction sizes. Our daemon is sending transactions that are too large to be accpeted into the chain. Im basing this on the fact that all unconfirmed send transactions have unusually high fees paid. Our default Txfee is .01 ANC and the mean over the last 1000 transactions is 0.10169169169169 which is why our withdrawal fee is set to .1 ANC

Code:

anoncoind listtransactions "" 1000 | grep -A 1 -B 4 '"confirmations" : 0,' | grep fee
   "fee" : -0.82000000,
   "fee" : -0.90000000,
   "fee" : -0.98000000,
   "fee" : -0.65000000,
   "fee" : -0.69000000,
   "fee" : -0.72000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.76000000,
   "fee" : -0.77000000,
   "fee" : -0.81000000,
   "fee" : -1.00000000,
   "fee" : -0.68000000,
   "fee" : -0.72000000,
   "fee" : -0.73000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.76000000,
   "fee" : -0.76000000,
   "fee" : -0.77000000,
   "fee" : -0.77000000,
   "fee" : -0.77000000,
   "fee" : -0.78000000,
   "fee" : -0.79000000,
   "fee" : -0.85000000,
   "fee" : -0.96000000,
   "fee" : -0.64000000,
   "fee" : -0.66000000,
   "fee" : -0.67000000,
   "fee" : -0.69000000,
   "fee" : -0.71000000,
   "fee" : -0.72000000,
   "fee" : -0.73000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.77000000,
   "fee" : -0.79000000,
   "fee" : -0.84000000,
   "fee" : -0.87000000,
   "fee" : -0.92000000,
   "fee" : -0.95000000,
   "fee" : -0.98000000,
   "fee" : -0.63000000,
   "fee" : -0.64000000,
   "fee" : -0.65000000,
   "fee" : -0.66000000,
   "fee" : -0.68000000,
   "fee" : -0.68000000,
   "fee" : -0.69000000,
   "fee" : -0.70000000,
   "fee" : -0.71000000,
   "fee" : -0.71000000,
   "fee" : -0.72000000,
   "fee" : -0.73000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.74000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.75000000,
   "fee" : -0.76000000,
   "fee" : -0.78000000,
   "fee" : -0.80000000,
   "fee" : -0.83000000,
   "fee" : -0.88000000,
   "fee" : -0.92000000,
   "fee" : -0.99000000,
   "fee" : -0.98000000,
   "fee" : -0.97000000,
   "fee" : -0.87000000,
   "fee" : -0.81000000,
   "fee" : -0.86000000,

Our daemon is up to date so ill be going over the source to see if I can find anything that would cause this

As you can see from my request to the daemon:

Code:

anoncoind listtransactions "" 1000 | grep -A 1 -B 4 '"confirmations" : 0,' | grep fee

I grabbed the last 1000 transactions and searched for any with "confirmations" : 0, and grabbed the fee for the transaction.

All of the unconfirmed transactions in our wallet paid a high fee suggesting its due to block size.

To counteract this until the issue is resolved by the developers i have merged any input in our wallet less than .1 anc ( about 50k of them ) into inputs over 1 ANC. These may have broken down to some smaller ones now so ill likely have to run it again

Here are some others with the same problem

Quote from: shtako on August 23, 2014, 07:57:45 AM
Quote from: SmokingSkull on August 21, 2014, 07:50:06 PM
Same Problem.

It makes me mad all the time Angry

And It's not good at all for beginners who want to buy into ANC when there are problems with Buying and Withdrawing.

Same problem. Tried to withdraw from bleutrade 2 days ago and the transaction still havent gone trough. To fix this should be highest priority.

Quote from: niteglider on August 22, 2014, 11:31:12 PM
Quote from: TCB4728 on August 21, 2014, 06:32:52 PM
Anyone else with the following problems with ANC? My multipool operator sent earned ANC to me on August 18 at 2:01AM CDT, was not received and posted to my wallet until August 21 at 13:58 CDT. The multipool operator states: "The transaction hasn't been included in a block yet. It should make it into a block eventually and be confirmed. I have no control over this. It's been an ongoing issue with the ANC network for a few weeks now." That would seem to be a very strong negative against this coin.

Yes, I am on the anonmining.com pool and it took a couple of days for an autotransfer to actually post to my wallet.

It was only 5 ANCs.

What gives?

In conclusion this is not a problem with cryptsy or "craptsy" as it is being called. It seems meeh and k1773R are aware and getting these transactions to confirm eventually so i see no reason to suspend the wallet as suggested above"

This was a good review of the problem - thanks for compiling this. Looks like if the transaction size is too big it will fail to confirm regardless of the the fee included. Can we get a dev response? Are you guys trying to identify this bug? The doesn't seem like it should be a very difficult thing to fix, probably just a couple lines of code.