Quote from: O_Omaha on October 11, 2014, 05:27:45 PM

Quote from: SebSebastian on October 11, 2014, 05:15:02 PM

Quote from: SebSebastian on October 11, 2014, 05:09:13 PM

Quote from: O_Omaha on October 11, 2014, 05:05:51 PM

Quote from: SebSebastian on October 11, 2014, 04:52:54 PM

Quote from: O_Omaha on October 11, 2014, 04:48:19 PM

Quote from: SebSebastian on October 11, 2014, 04:43:28 PM

Quote from: O_Omaha on October 11, 2014, 04:37:40 PM

Quote from: SebSebastian on October 11, 2014, 04:34:49 PM

Quote from: O_Omaha on October 11, 2014, 04:31:17 PM

Quote from: SebSebastian on October 11, 2014, 04:27:07 PM

Quote from: O_Omaha on October 11, 2014, 04:09:24 PM

Quote from: itsAj on October 11, 2014, 04:01:34 PM

Wrongful things being said in this thread ShadowCash has pioneered some great code.

What exactly? First staking mobile wallet?

Or the stealth addresses that StealthCoin has because the ShadowCash devs were generous enough to open source the code?

I realise a lot of you guys are angry, but try to remember who your fight is with. If you attack the Shadow dev you'll lose because he had nothing to do with this, and if there are any honest people left in crypto I'd wager he is one of them. I won't even go into his work - anyone who takes the time to look into it sees that it speaks for itself.

People seem to be blaming LongAndShort for the drop in Stealth's price, but if all it takes is one person raising questions (albeit very persistenly) to crash the market, how solid is the coin's foundation in the first place?

"If you attack the Shadow dev you'll lose because he had nothing to do with this, and if there are any honest people left in crypto I'd wager he is one of them."

There are lot's of angry people over in the cinnicoin community that would spit in your face if you muttered that. If you havent already, why not educate yourself on the facts? read thru cinni coin thread.

Sad to see the people crying "fud" becoming the fudsters. The dev claimed a bounty by implementing encrypted messaging in Cinni, thereby adding value to the coin. He had no obligations to Cinni beyond that and the Cinni devs have even said that they were on good terms when he left to start Shadow.

So it's your word, verses the word of the Cinni devs themselves. Any other misconceptions/misinformation you'd like help with?

His word against many respected cinnicoin investors that have no reason to lie. hmmm...

My beef is not with the developer. So lets stop this.

No, you don't get off that easy if you are going to be lying about people (even if it is out of frustration).

Quote from: CinniCoin on August 24, 2014, 03:16:21 PM

Quote from: battbot on August 24, 2014, 12:34:04 AM

Hello,

For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread).

Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned.

As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code.

Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened.

Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin.

battbot

I can confirm that what Battbot is saying is correct.

Be careful you don't become what you hate.

Best of luck to you.

You too, bro and BTW I'm not lying, I'm just re-expressing the sentiment of many, many, cinnicoin investors. Why would they lie?

I've just quoted you a comment from the main cinni dev and another contributor. If investors are claiming otherwise, all I can say is that sometimes people act irrationally when they find out that they've invested in a project without properly investigating its validity.

You got the SDC blinders on bro! I know, I know, when you are invested in a coin and really believe in it, it's almost like gang mentality. So I won't try to change your mind. Just remember that things arent always what they seem and occam's razor doesn't apply in this crazy convoluted game.

So your reply is... "uh, well... you're just like blinded bro". So now you're attacking me instead of addressing my point. Again, can you provide any evidence that would prove false the quotes from the Cinni devs themselves? Or are you just going to resort to another ad hominem?

You're not replying to this then? Not going to apologise for spreading falsehoods about someone who's done nothing to you?

Seb.
I didn't claim anything. I simply said that "There are lot's of angry people over in the cinnicoin community that would spit in your face if you muttered that. " and "I'm just re-expressing the sentiment of many, many, cinnicoin investors."

Like I said read the cinni thread and if you are sincerely concerned about it, ask some of the members there that say he is lying.

I wont respond to anything further on this issue.

That's like me saying well StealthCoin's vapourware because I read it on the Stealth thread. The Cinni devs have put those claims to bed. If any Cinni investors have any evidence to back up their claims let them come here and back them up. Otherwise you trying to cast doubt over the claims of the Shadow and Cinni devs is just another way to lash out because you blame members of the Shadow community for Stealth's fall in price.

When I invest, I do it carefully. And the amount of people in the community that I think are dumbasses doesn't enter the equation. The Shadow devs are no more responsible for the actions of all the community members than Hondo is for yours.