Quote from: iram3130 on October 11, 2014, 10:21:49 PM

Quote from: PrimedicePlayersUnion on October 11, 2014, 10:00:32 PM

Quote from: binaryFate on October 11, 2014, 01:17:19 PM

[...]

we know u own luckyb.it
please buy this site, it seems as if ure interested

Look like he is really interested that is why he is enquiring before bid.
It will be another great pick on binaryfate portfolio if he buy this.

No, I was just brought here from the fiasco.ninja thread, and then got curious about the fairness aspect.
Some time ago I was trying to design a multiplayer game, the project was later abandoned but I'm still intellectualy interested in the topic. It is very challenging to design a fair multiplayer game without the possibility of shill from insider (ie, owner/operator), that is equally fair to everybody. I remember helping the satoshirat guy to change his game so it was fair, but it definitely puts some heavy constraints on the design. My current stance is that if the round is on a time scale of minutes, a multiplayer game can be fair only if there is no action/choice involved in a round, only stochasticity (like satoshirat). If the round is on a longer time scale (like a day) the game definitely can involve action/choice from participants and be fair at the same time (imagine that the outcome to determine the winner could be the hash of the first block that comes after midnight). I'm getting off-topic, sorry. Cheesy

Anyway no I'm not interested to buy it, but this has nothing to do with the quality of moneypot. I wish it will sell well!