Quote from: sonysasankan on October 14, 2014, 03:26:14 PM

Quote from: barabbas on October 14, 2014, 09:59:27 AM

Quote from: travis72682 on October 14, 2014, 07:48:12 AM

he said a while back (before growth) that he had .1 seed

You sir are mistaken... and wrong as usual. I have never posted if I do or not have any SEED. I don't believe it is of any relevance since I have explained, many times already, that my "interest" in this project is related to the fact that the entire dev team of PINK has thrown out any credibility the may have had for supporting, promoting and sponsoring this debacle, as well as tainted in an irreparable way, the good name of PINK, in which I hold a modest investment.

So let me get this right. You are holding your "modest investment" of pink, solely based on the credibility and reputation of the devs.... which by the way is "tainted and irrepairable" and simply "thrown out" the window. So then Im assuming you are still holding on to them because of the technology developed for pink? Surely that cannot be true... you yourself think they are unnecessary and should've just let it be. But what about the code? Gasp! We did not come forth openly until it we were "caught" by jyap that is was a "hack job/copy/paste" (that you so often repeat like a broken record in every post Cheesy

) of Novacoin. Surely, this is unacceptable right? I mean... all the people in the dev team knew all along from even before the take over that it was a novacoin "hack job/copy/paste" (i love repeating that too... makes me feel all informed like Roll Eyes

And charity? Pfft... you dont seem to think there's any "focus" on that these days right? And its also "the gambling coin" or something right? A phrase you coined and insist its now popularly known by that new name, yet cant for the life of me find anyone (other than you) referring to it like that. So then since you are all facts and logic and high school math n stuff, there really is no incentive to be invested in pink right? I know you mentioned something about your exit from pink as imminent or something of the sort. Seriously... how long do we have to wait? You don't think pink is going to "get better" or something do you? Your posts definitely is a testament to that. So what then? Is it a means to justify your presence here? Each time someone asks what your intentions are, you conveniently parrot your "modest investment" of pink, and connect that as "reason" here... pretending like as if you are making up your mind to judge the quality of the devs to protect your "modest investment".

Of late, I'm noticing you clinging on to meaningless phrases like "supporting, promoting and sponsoring" and repeating them like those brainwashing tapes playing in loop. "Supporting" and "promoting" is more or less the same when it comes to the small world of alt coins. I know it can mean something completely different outside that world. I just cant figure out what the whole "sponsoring" is all about. Are you saying we're paying cryptzo to continue developments for the coin? If that makes sense to you, please elaborate. If it doesnt, do give the source where you came across such info. If its a theory, why are you conveniently not mentioning that and passing it off as facts? You, after all "call it as it is" I believe.

u are giving too much credit man. pigs cannot look up you kno. the neck does not allow them to see the sky Cool