Quote from: Este Nuno on October 21, 2014, 08:19:46 PM

Quote from: bitcoinbboyce on October 21, 2014, 06:58:27 PM

Quote from: Este Nuno on October 21, 2014, 12:44:10 PM

Quote from: yayayo on October 21, 2014, 10:36:22 AM

Mhhh... I don't know if this is a good idea.

Reputation makes sense when it comes to transactions, but for content only it doesn't provide more information than can be obtained by reading. Actually I think it's likely to lead to abuse, either to damage or improve a user's reputation. It will quickly establish biases and prejudice towards users as well because the importance of every post will be evaluated based on the user's reputation, giving less attention to the actual content and disregarding the fact that even low rep. / high rep. users might also post quality / crap content.

As a result it will make conversations in the forum more one-dimensional and superficial. People will read less and will pay less attention taking the reputation short route.

ya.ya.yo!

I don't think it will be as distracting as you might think. Originally there won't be anyway to see someones reputation right away without going to the ledger site. That might change overtime if we develop a browser extension will could overlay each persons reputation.

The general idea is that it incentives good content and provides people will a small reward(that has the possibility of appreciating over time in adoption grows re:demand).

People won't be able to damage anyone's reputation as there is unlikely to be anyway to negatively affect it. People trying to abuse the system will hopefully be mitigated somewhat by the algorithm developed. But also remember that every marking is on a public ledger, and humans tend to be good at spotting things that don't look right. So people who attempt to abuse the system will likely be spotted I would think.

If someone makes a new account and is posting quality posts and good content I would expect that person to be marked accordingly and receive reputation.

People should still be reading threads as they do now I'd imagine. I don't know why people would read less than they do now.

Thanks for the comments.

Quote from: bitkate on October 21, 2014, 10:39:14 AM

bad idea because this is forum not room chat

I would think it would be more important than chat, as more substantive issues are normally discussed on forums. People can be rewarded for contributing thought provoking posts, or making people aware of important information.

So how can I now do this marking you talk?? I see on polo, but who to do on here Huh

If it were active now it would be something like this:

+20 bitcoinbboyce great question

Not sure on how the exact syntax will be after testing. But something like that.

Ok so the syntax will be the same as the polo marking, this have ledger too? How to retrieve my marks from btt??

You will try btc-e twitter and Facebook too??